Special Features:
GridXpert CEO ON GRID MATURATION IN EUROPE By Derrick Harris, Editor
GRIDtoday editor Derrick Harris recently spoke with GridXpert CEO Sven Lung
about his up and coming company. GridXpert is based in France, and Lung
discusses, among other topics, the differences in Grid adoption between
European companies and those based in the United States.
GRIDtoday: First of all, Sven, can you give a brief personal history and tell
me how you ended up as CEO of GridXpert?
SVEN LUNG: I have entrepreneurial and investing experience. My first
experience as an investor was in 1996 when I became one of the first investors
in Finance Net which became BOURSORAMA in 1998, and when I co-founded the
Incubator Republic Alley in July 1999.
I founded my first company in 1996, the Southern Subsidiary of INTERSHOP. In
parallel in 1998, I co-founded Imediation, where I held the position of VP
International and launched the U.S. subsidiary which grew to 100 employees. In
2001, I joined ETF Group, an entrepreneurial VC based in France and
Switzerland; and then in 2002, I finally co-founded GridXpert.
Gt: It has been said that Grid computing generally means as many different
things as there are people in the room. How would you define it?
LUNG: I will define Grid as a method and set of technologies to virtualize the
underlying compute and storage infrastructure: to allow this, Grid includes
features to locate, manage and monitor disparate compute and storage resources
and features to provide a virtual access to these resources and the required
application and software components in a way which optimizes the usage of
these resources for the users considered globally.
Gt: In a nutshell, what services does GridXpert provide? What makes it a
better choice than its competitors?
LUNG: GridXpert provides the product suite GX Synergy we categorize as a
"service Grid": it allows to modelize the extended IT infrastructure as Grid
services for the end users -- a Grid service being a virtual access to compute
and storage resources -- and to optimally answers to end users requests by
providing the appropriate Grid services at the considered time and for the
required capacity. GX Synergy provides the complete process to declare Grid
services and to map them on the IT infrastructure, to locate the appropriate
Grid services for end user requests and to manage the requests, to
continuously analyze progress and to adapt to changes.
From the beginning, we focus on a solution which optimizes end user requests
on the IT infrastructure considering that an end user must have access to the
IT assets of the company in a productive way. So, GX Synergy is a solution
which tends, on one hand, to optimize the end user work by simplifying as much
as possible the IT interface and to make the end user concentrate on his
applicative tasks and on the other hand to consider the IT infrastructure as a
whole which must optimally respond to the end user demands along the time: for
this we have introduced dynamic meta-scheduling and virtual data spaces
features to be able to adjust the view of the IT infrastructure to the demand.
Gt: You've been quoted as saying, "GridXpert goes beyond technology and
concentrates on making people more productive." Can you elaborate on the
"people" aspect of this statement?
LUNG: As previously said, GX Synergy intends to provide to users the best
resources at the required time. This is done according to an innovative
process where projects (through their project manager) shop for Grid services
according to technical/capacity and economical parameters; members of projects
have then accessed to the Grid services adapted to their needs; when users
submit a task, from this set of Grid services, the dynamic meta-scheduler and
data spaces manager provide the appropriate Grid services to solve the task
taken into account the constraints of time, robustness and security of the
users.
Gt: What is the European marketplace like for a Grid solutions company? What
kind of rate of adoption do you see for enterprise Grids in Europe?
LUNG: We see a fast maturation of the European marketplace regarding
Grid-based initiatives in the industry sector. Large industrial players in
automotive, aerospace, electronics, energy or biopharma are faced with an
exponential need for additional computing power driven by simulation. They are
actively considering Grid-based architectures as a way to rationalize Research
and Engineering IT, so it can meet the demand challenges and scale up
cost-effectively. Advanced organizations realize that technology is now mature
enough to allow a "make or buy" decision. In the past, they had to build
"hard-wired" pseudo service-based architectures, which are hard and expensive
to maintain (and not core-business).
Innovators have piloted in 2004 and are now proceeding to full deployment.
Early adopters have scoped technology, and are now budgeting pilot deployments
in the first half of 2005, with budget lines for full deployment in the second
part of the year.
Gt: Do you see differences in Grid adoption between European and U.S.
companies? If so, what are they?
LUNG: Clearly the U.S. lead the way in the financial sector, where the core
value proposition is straight application acceleration. We see a much more
balanced activity in the industrial sector, where evaluation cycles tend to be
more exhaustive, touching a number of infrastructure issues. Large vendors and
professional services organizations show a majority of Use Cases coming out of
Europe. Traditionally, Europeans industrialists tend to take a broader view on
things, having to deal with a high level of sophistication in the extended
enterprise models, due to the complex structure of markets and partnerships.
Gt: Can you speak a little about the recent multi-site Grid solution you
deployed for Arcelor Flat Carbon Steel?
LUNG: To take a world leader position in the steel industry, Aceralia, Arbed,
and Usinor gathered into a unique enterprise: Arcelor.
Bringing together 11 different research centers induces heterogeneous
resources and capacities, redundancies, under-utilized resources and
bottlenecks on some systems or networks. Therefore, the objective was to
rationalize the resources of the R&D centers within the new framework of their
geographical and functional organization:
- federate available resources.
- optimize & improve resources utilization.
- rationalize software licenses use.
- Thanks to Grid infrastructure, global computing capacity improved up to 35
percent, avoiding bottlenecks and enabling Arcelor to face peaks of loads and
improve researchers' productivity.
- Users have a single view of all available IT resources, (and don't have to
care about their geographic location or their management).
- IT resources utilization improves, and is much more efficient and
optimized. Double computing are avoided.
- Scientific IT costs decreased by more than 20 percent using a Grid.
But in my opinion, Christian Standaert, the VP Innovation R&D for Arcelor FCS,
better describes the overall benefit when he says: "Innovation for Arcelor FCS
concerns not only the products and services we offer our clients, but also our
capacity to adapt our internal management to the market demand. Thanks to
GridXpert we realized a breakthrough in our internal processes through the
restructuration of our scientific information system; allowing it to be
optimized to triple the capacity usage of the available resources -- whilst
improving productivity, quality of service, ease of use -- and reducing
scientific IT costs by more than 20 percent"
Gt: Has the company had any other big wins in the end-user department? What
are they?
LUNG: Unfortunately, as of today, we can't communicate freely about our other
wins. What we can say is that we have demonstrated the ability of an
architecture, able to sustain thousands of CAD users accessing compute
resources remotely, and tapping into outside resources in peakload situations.
We have also addressed complex workflow issues, dealing with very large files
and allowing the mutualization of heterogenous resources across countries.
Gt: I see that the company closely follows the Globus Project and OGSA
standards. How do you feel about the work of the Enterprise Grid Alliance and
its attempt to establish standards for commercial Grids? Has GridXpert given
any thought to joining the recently launched EGA steering committee in Europe?
LUNG: We are in the process to participate in the EGA initiative as we see
here a great opportunity to confront, to share and to make progress our
industrial expertises and vision in the Grid community. Moreover, after a
first phase where we demonstrate innovation and technical expertise to our
customers to solve their pains, we need to continue to increase our
credibility vis-a-vis of them through standards adherence.
Gt: Finally, I would invite you to address any topics not covered here of
which you would like GRIDtoday's readers to be aware.
LUNG: We will be launching Version 2 of the GX Synergy software suite in early
2005. We are preparing a bunch of new features and invite GRIDtoday's readers
to discover them soon.
|