GRIDtoday Logo Altair

DAILY NEWS AND INFORMATION FOR THE GLOBAL GRID COMMUNITY /

( Previous Article )    ( Table of Contents )   

Special Features:

GRID TOP DOGS ON GGF11, COOPERATION WITH EGA
By Tom Tabor, Publisher

Between beautiful sunrises and glorious sunsets, more than 500 practitioners from around the world, including the Grid elite, gathered this week at GGF11 in Honolulu. The five-day conference focused primarily on Grid standards and broad deployment challenges of Grid technologies. GRIDtoday caught up with those responsible for enticing so many to the island paradise, only to stick those attendees in all-day, indoor meetings.

Tom Tabor, publisher of GRIDtoday, sat down with GGF Chair Charlie Catlett, GGF Executive Director Steve Crumb and GGF11 Program Chair, and global coordinator of SGI Grid strategy, Walter Stewart to discuss the event and what to expect for GGF12.


GRIDtoday: It's nice to get a chance to sit down with you guys, and I'm wondering, overall, how are the meetings going?

CHARLIE CATLETT: Great! Many folks have made comments to me that with each GGF meeting they are more and more impressed with how well our working groups and research groups are operating; and with the quality of our focused workshops.

Gt: That's good to hear. Specifically, what were some of your key objectives at these meetings?

CATLETT: We had two themes to this meeting. The first was that we wanted to examine and expose the state of operational Grids in support of research -- the good, the bad and the ugly. This information exchange was tremendously useful not just to those running Grids, but also to those who are just getting started, in that this helps them to understand how to plan their Grid deployment with the benefit of others' experiences.

The second theme was our growing collaborations with other standards bodies. We were delighted to have a keynote from Jamie Clark, manager for technical standards development for OASIS, as well as speakers from W3C, DMTF and EGA. I was particularly pleased to see the collaborative spirit evidenced on our panel on Grid standards collaboration. The panel included Jamie Clark (OASIS), Roger Reich (Veritas, DMTF), Philippe Le Hegaret (W3C), Adrian Cockcroft (Sun, EGA) and Dave Snelling (Fujitsu, GGF).

Gt: Alright. Where are you in terms of accomplishing these two goals?

CATLETT: Well, I would say, judging from the number of new faces involved in the discussions about production Grid experience ... I'd say we made very good progress in terms of helping those who are deploying Grids. This providing of a forum for exchanging, and spreading, experience is something we have a lot of experience doing -- it has been one of the long-standing strengths of GGF. It's increasingly important as more industries begin to adopt Grid computing.

Our other focus -- cultivating collaboration among standards organizations -- is also going to be more and more important as Grid technologies are adopted, deployed and used. Because we had many representatives here from OASIS, EGA, W3C and DMTF, we were able to spend some time brainstorming about how to better work together. With OASIS, DMTF and W3C we were able to sit down in small groups to look at how our liaison activities are going. With EGA we have had many discussions on the telephone and this was our first opportunity to sit down face to face to talk about how to work together. So we were not only able to strength existing ties, but to begin to solidify new ones with groups like EGA.

GGF11 was also a first experiment in offering other standards bodies the opportunity to hold their own meetings, private or open, within the GGF venue. We had some DMTF and OASIS groups who took advantage of this and this is a program we have offered to others, including EGA, as well. GGF has several deeply rooted strengths, such as forging consensus and building diverse communities where commercial and academic participants work together. What you are seeing with our interactions with other standards bodies is an application of those strengths, and something we believe is a significant contribution we can make to Grid standards.

Gt: Do you foresee these issues carrying over to the Brussels meeting in September?

CATLETT: Absolutely. Brussels will build on both of these themes. In Brussels, we have lined up speakers and panels to talk about deployment of Grid technologies in support of the commercial enterprise -- beyond the research enterprise we spoke about here at GGF11. In addition, we will expand on the use of GGF venues to host technical committees and working groups from other standards organizations, increasing the opportunity for cross-fertilization among participants. Of course, we are sensitive to the need to provide venues that allow for private sessions under the various intellectual property rules of each organization. The point is not so much to try to combine multiple standards processes into one room, but to get people walking the same halls and eating meals together.

WALTER STEWART: The plenary sessions of GGF12 will focus on Grids deployed. Those sessions will be divided among industry specific panels -- telco, pharmaceutical, automotive, aerospace, finance -- and sessions on Grid issues that touch all sectors -- ROI of Grids, marketing the Grid concept within the enterprise, human resource issues of Grids, deployment experiences, etc.

STEVE CRUMB: We really have multiple goals with the September meeting. As always, our first priority is the work of our technical groups, workshops and tutorials. However, we are also building on the momentum started at Gt'04 by providing a one and a half day plenary program geared at Grid deployment in the commercial sector. We are bringing together deployment veterans from multiple industries who can share the real benefits and challenges of their Grid deployments. We believe this program will answer many of the questions being asked by senior management about the relevance of Grids in their organization.

Gt: You mentioned that an EGA member spoke at GGF11. How else was the EGA involved?

CATLETT: Many of the EGA leaders are very strong and active in GGF. Our standards collaboration panel included Adrian Cockcroft from EGA, who presented an overview of EGA. We've also got several companies represented in our steering group and on our advisory committee who are active in EGA committees, as well.

Gt: Well, that seems like a good sign of things to come. Where do you see this relationship going?

CATLETT: I'd say that there is a very clear desire on the part of GGF and EGA to work together, and we are talking about how we would like that to happen. The details as to how we can do that are going to be more clear to all of us as we continue our dialog. I think we will very rapidly converge on some areas where we collaborate, and others where it makes sense for us to rely on one another. I'd prefer to be concrete about that as we make progress, so ask me again in Brussels.

STEWART: During GGF11, the GGF12 program committee met. The program committee includes several people active in EGA. Our EGA members have agreed to review the program and come back to the full program committee next week with a proposal on how the EGA can best be engaged in the GGF12 program.

Gt: On to another topic, if I may. Charlie, what will your role be by September?

CATLETT: Well, in September, we will make the transition to the new GGF chair, and I'll be focusing my energies on the TeraGrid. In fact, that transition has already begun and is moving quickly. I'll be involved in the GGF Steering Committee as a resource to the new chair, but not in any of the day to day activities.

Gt: Speaking of the new chair, how's the search going? Who will bare the banner for GGF by then?

CATLETT: I wish I could say who the candidates are, because it's a very impressive list. I'm very pleased with the quality of the people who are on the final short list -- there simply are no bad choices on this list.

Gt: Well, fellows, it's been a pleasure. Before we go our separate ways, does anyone have any final thoughts on the state of Grid and Grid standards?

CRUMB: I'd like to add that another purpose of our meeting was to allow the OGSA-WG to educate and bring the community up to speed on the state of its framework for grids, Open Grid Services Architecture. During the overview talk, the working group was pleased to announce the availability of the OGSA Specification version 1.0. This draft will enter the GGF Editor "pipeline" for review prior to a public comment period in late June through early July. This marks a significant milestone for the OGSA-WG and for the community.

( Top of Page )

( Previous Article )    ( Table of Contents )