GRIDtoday Logo ClearSpeed

DAILY NEWS AND INFORMATION FOR THE GLOBAL GRID COMMUNITY / SEPTEMBER 22, 2003: VOL. 2 NO. 38

   ( Table of Contents )   

Systems/Enterprise:

FABRIC NETWORKS CLOSES
By John Abbott For the451.com

The merger of two InfiniBand companies earlier this year to form Fabric Networks has unraveled already. The combination of the original two companies, InfiniSwitch and Lane 15, was not enough to gain the momentum that investors were hoping to see. CEO Alisa Nessler and a handful of staff are staying on to wind down operations, sell the company's IP to any interested buyers and help look around for new investment opportunities for the remaining cash in hand.

The closure is yet another blow for the InfiniBand sector, which has been waiting, apparently fruitlessly, for the enterprise adoption cycle to begin. The investors judged the current market opportunity as not big enough to build a company on, and have lost patience as OEMs continue to kick tires and end users show no signs of buying. That decision puts some doubt on the future of the remaining few InfiniBand players, such as TopSpin and InfiniCon Systems.

Impact Assessment

The Message

Fabric Networks has run out of runway. Its original target market of InfiniBand has yet to take off in the enterprise, and there's not enough room for it to expand its technology for other fabrics. So it's closing its doors, looking to sell off its intellectual property and will invest its remaining funds elsewhere.

Competitive Landscape

This is good news for proprietary interconnect companies such as Quadrics and Myrinet, which at one stage looked as if they would be swept away by the emergence of InfiniBand. Among InfiniBand survivors there are still InfiniCon, Mellanox, TopSpin and Voltaire.

The451 Assessment

As we've been saying for some time, InfiniBand still looks like a good bet as a replacement for proprietary interconnects, particularly for internal use within servers. But that won't be a sufficiently large market to sustain many companies, particularly those that have raised large sums of money in the hope of a broader market opportunity. Quadrics and Myrinet are long-term interconnect survivors, but they've grown slowly and are likely to remain niche players.

Context

Lane15 was founded in April 2000 and developed firmware for InfiniBand companies. It hoped to see multiple OEMs pick up its work. InfiniSwitch was one of those OEMs; it was founded a few months later and developed its own line of InfiniBand switches. Together, the two raised about $47m in funding before the decision was made to merge in March 2003. With that agreement, the companies gained a further $12m from the combined pool of investors, which included nine VC companies and strategic investors Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Intel and Quanta.

The idea behind the merger, and the name change to Fabric Networks a few months later, was to focus on the broader opportunity of intelligent switched fabric networks. Following reorganization and staff cuts at both companies, Fabric Networks was left with about 60 staff and $20 million cash in hand. Its products included InfiniBand switches, host channel adapters and management software.

Rationale

Fabric Networks says it has gained some traction in the high performance computing market, but margins are too small in HPC, and not enough to sustain the business. An enterprise end-user market just hasn't materialized, and doesn't look likely to for some time to come, if ever. It's not that the industry has turned its back altogether on InfiniBand –- most of the major systems companies are still planning to use it as an internal interconnect within server products –- but that Ethernet and fiber channel remain entrenched for more general connectivity of servers and storage.

InfiniBand is likely to continue to maintain the performance edge for high-speed, low-latency clusters, and that market may well take off in the enterprise as grid strategies from commercial players such as Oracle and HP start to wind up. But that's currently just a small niche opportunity. And as 10G Ethernet emerges and prices drop, it's bound to encroach further into InfiniBand territory.

Strategy

Fabric Networks is ceasing all its InfiniBand work, and has laid off the 30 or so staff that were left, leaving just a few, including CEO Nessler, to wind down operations. The idea is to sell off the intellectual property to anyone who might be interested, and then to reinvest the remaining money into another startup, unrelated to InfiniBand. Its switch ASIC technology and management software might be of interest to companies such as Adaptec, Agilent, Broadcom, Emulex, LSI-Mylex, QLogic or Vixel. Other InfiniBand companies are less likely to take it on, due to their own financial constraints.

There's no word on how the remaining cash will be spent, or on how much of the $20 million cash pile held back in March is still left. The VCs who have put money into Fabric Networks include Austin Ventures, Bessemer Venture Partners, Index Ventures, LightSpeed Ventures, Moore Capital Management and TL Ventures.

Competition

Lane15 had one direct competitor, Vieo, which changed direction toward broader systems management at the end of last year. It's not clear yet whether it will make it, but the $20 million in extra funding it's gained since will help. InfiniSwitch's direct competitors included Paceline (assets sold to Motorola in May), InfiniCon, TopSpin and Voltaire. Host bus adapter maker JNI, which had put InfiniBand at the heart of its strategy, has just been sold off to Applied Micro Circuits. Omegaband closed last year, and Banderacom has changed its focus to Ethernet. Intel and IBM both pulled out of the InfiniBand components business a while ago, leaving Agilent and startup Mellanox as the only significant players. Mellanox is expanding out from its chip focus into host channel adapters, switches (it supplies switches to Voltaire on an OEM basis) and interconnect packages for HPC users.

Delays in InfiniBand adoption have meant a stay of execution for the proprietary interconnect companies like Quadics and Myrinet. Earlier this month, for instance, IBM announced the availability of Myrinet as the high-speed cluster interconnect for its eServer BladeCenter blade server product line –- something that observers might have expected InfiniBand to be used for, given IBM's general support for the technology. Sun Microsystems has opted for InfiniBand for use with its own blade servers.

( Top of Page )

   ( Table of Contents )