 |
|
DAILY NEWS AND INFORMATION
FOR THE GLOBAL GRID COMMUNITY / JULY 21, 2003; VOL. 2 NO. 29
|
Special Features:
WORLD RENOWNED EMEAGWALI -
METAPHYSICS OF THE GRID by Philip Emeagwali, computer scientist
Following is a transcript of a keynote address delivered by Philip
Emeagwali
at a conference of the Black Data Processing Association, Augusta, Georgia,
April 26, 2003:
We are information technology thought leaders. And as thought leaders,
society
expects us to provide it a vision of where information technology will be in
the future.
Tonight, I will like to time travel 100 years into the future, and predict
some major developments in information technology which, I believe, will occur
at the end of this century.
Some of my predictions will be right. Some will be wrong. And you might
even
find some difficult to believe.
Information technology is a broad field. Certainly, it will become broader
by
the end of this century. Therefore, I will simplify and reduce the complexity
of what I will discuss. I will limit my self to what I call the "kernel of
information technology."
Any body of knowledge has its "kernel of knowledge." I also call it the
irreducible essence from which that body of knowledge emanates.
In your study of geometry, one of the key concepts that you learned was
that
all the theorems in geometry were constructed from a few rules of logic and
some axioms. The axioms of geometry were what we call "self evident
truths."
The axioms of geometry are to geometers what the constitution is to
lawyers.
The self-evident truths in the law books are the statements written in the
United States constitution. In other words, the constitution contains the
kernel of knowledge from which all laws were derived.
Similarly, the computer and the Internet are the kernel technologies behind
the information technology field. By that I mean that if all the computers in
the world and the Internet were to disappear today, the IT field will for all
practical purposes also disappear.
The reason is that information technology’s conceptual foundation rests on
the
concepts of computation and communication.
In other words, computation and communication are to IT what zeros and ones
are to computers. Therefore, information technology’s kernel of knowledge is
derived from two concepts: computing and communicating.
The supercomputer is the driving force behind the computer. The
supercomputer
of today is the computer of tomorrow. Therefore, predicting the future of
computing implicitly forces us to first predict the future of supercomputing.
And if history were to repeat itself, one can predict the status of computing
at the end of the 21st century by studying next-generation supercomputing.
As I said earlier, you will find some of my statements outlandish. Now I
will
make my first outlandish claim about the relationship between the
supercomputer and the Internet:
Today and at the beginning of the 21st, the supercomputer is similar to the
Internet. By the end of the 21st century, the computer, as we know it today,
will become obsolete. Then the supercomputer and the Internet will become one
and the same.
My prediction that computers will become obsolete will not seem outlandish
when you reflect on the relationship between the supercomputer and the
Internet. And also reflect on the driving force behind their evolutions.
The engine that drives a supercomputer is the tightly-coupled thousands of
processors which we’ve harnessed to compute and communicate
simultaneously.
Similarly, the engine that drives the Internet is the loosely-coupled
millions
of computers that we’ve harnessed to compute and communicate,
asynchronously.
Therefore, both the supercomputer and the Internet, in essence, comprise of
interconnected computing and communicating nodes. Both use communication
protocols for transmitting and receiving data. And so on.
Therefore, both the supercomputer and the Internet germinated from the same
conceptual idea, namely, the knowledge that thousands of processing nodes can
compute and communicate, simultaneously.
The irreducible essence of a supercomputer is computation and
communication,
but the supercomputer places a greater emphasis on computation.
The irreducible essence of the Internet is computation and communication,
also, but the Internet places a greater emphasis on communication.
The irreducible essence of information technology is computation and
communication, with an equal emphasis on the computer and the Internet.
In other words, the irreducible essence of the supercomputer, the Internet
and
the information technology field are the same.
To forecast the future of the computer and the Internet, requires that we
understand the difference and the relationship between both technologies.
And that we ask: why was each technology invented?
And that we ask: What is the most important difference between a
supercomputer
and the Internet?
The answer is that the supercomputer resides within a room, while the
Internet
encircles the whole Earth.
The relationship between the supercomputer and the Internet is best
understood
by asking:
Why was the supercomputer invented? And why was the Internet developed?
The answer is that the supercomputer was invented to help computational
scientists perform faster computations.
The Internet was developed to help computational scientists access remote
supercomputers.
The media tells us that the Internet was invented to help the United States
defends itself against nuclear attacks. That story is not true.
What happened is that in the telling and the retelling of why the Internet
was
invented, facts became obscured, lost and added and we even forget why the
Internet was invented. The story of how the Internet was invented to enable
access to supercomputers evolved into the myth that the Internet was invented
to enable the United States survive a nuclear attack.
The less glamorous truth is that the Internet was funded and built to
enable
physicists solve the most computation-intensive mathematical problems in the
computing field. The Internet was invented to enable computational scientists
to access and use remote supercomputers.
The Internet originated because the supercomputer created a need for it.
Therefore, it was the supercomputer technology that gave birth to the
Internet. The supercomputer is the father of the Internet.
We also have many other myths and misconceptions about the origin of the
Internet. The most popular of these myths include the argument that software
such as communication protocols, email, the Web and graphic browsers gave
birth to the Internet.
I disagree. The software cannot give birth to the hardware that it runs on.
Windows Operating System did not give birth to the PC. It is the PC that gave
birth to Windows Operating System.
Similarly, it is the Internet that gave birth to communication protocols,
email, the Web, and graphic browsers. These software were merely inventions
that helped bring the Internet to the masses.
In fact, the technology was in the air for several decades but the email
and
the Web helped bring the Internet down to Earth.
Once more, the driving force behind the Internet was the supercomputer. I
believe that the supercomputer will remain the driving force behind the
next-generation Internet.
Internet2 is the name of this next-generation Internet. Internet3 will
probably be the name of the next-next-generation Internet. We may have
Internet4, 5, 6 and ten.
I will coin the words "InternetX" or SuperBrain and use them to describe
the
most advanced form of Internet that we might have ten-generations and beyond.
Also, I interchangeably use the words InternetX and SuperBrain.
And as information technology thought leaders, we have to provide a vision
of
the future of the Internet.
We have to ask the question:
What will "InternetX" or SuperBrain be like?
"InternetX" or SuperBrain will remain the same size as the Internet. The
Internet is an electronic system that is literally as large as the whole
Earth. It is a huge electronic cloth that we have placed upon the Earth.
When an object is ten thousand miles in diameter, we need to step outside
and
look at that object to see the big picture and to even understand the
object.
Therefore, we will gain a clearer understanding of the Internet if we
observe
it from another planet.
Attempting to understand the Internet while standing on Earth reminds me of
the parable of the nine blind men and an elephant.
Each blind man based his descriptions of the elephant on a generalization
of
his sensory perceptions.
The first blind man touched the elephant’s knee cried that the elephant is
like a tree. The second blind man touched the tail argued that it is like a
rope. And so on.
The most popular software on the Internet are email and the World Wide Web.
As
a result, most people cannot explain the difference between the Web with the
Net. Like the blind men, people use the Web and then generalize and assume
that the Web and the Net are the similar.
Because the fiber-optic network underneath the Internet is physically
10,000
miles wide and metaphorically speaking is like an elephant, it is difficult to
find two people who will agree on the best definition of the Internet.
To those of us standing on the Earth, the Internet is tool for sending
email
and surfing the World Wide Web.
But to an alien from out of space, the Internet will be seen as millions of
interconnected computing and communicating nodes. The alien will see the
Internet as a spherical object as large as the entire Earth that is used for
transmitting and receiving data.
I believe that it is the alien, who is observing the Internet from outer
space, that will see the true picture. I will ask you to visualize yourself as
that alien observing the Internet from the moon. I will also also ask you to
travel with me, 100 years into the future.
My prediction is that, in 100 years, the Internet will evolve and become
more
tightly coupled. It will be more powerful, faster and more intelligent than
what we have today.
This will be achieved because the computers at each node will be a zillion
times more powerful. And the communication between nodes will also be a
zillion times faster. Perhaps, each node might be a zillion times more
intelligent.
When the Internet becomes a zillion times more powerful, faster and more
intelligent: Something weird will then happen.
communicating by t-mail or telepathic mail.
It makes sense to predict that the Internet will disappear into the
"InternetX" or SuperBrain. Since SuperBrain is closer to a computer than to
the Internet, it will makes sense to predict that the Internet will disappear
into the universal computer which, itself, will literally be as large as the
Earth.
A universal computer, as large as the whole world, is not merely science
fiction. We have taken the first embryonic step to build one. It is called
grid computing. In fact, the United States, the United Kingdom and a dozen
nations have already committed billions of dollars to develop grid
computing.
In essence, the grid will reduce the gap between the supercomputer and the
Internet. It is a technology that lies at the half-way point between the
supercomputer and the Internet.
Thirty years ago, the driving force behind the Internet was the
supercomputer.
For the next thirty years, I believe that the grid will remain the driving
force behind the next-generation Internet.
The grid will enable us to do things that we now consider impossible. It
will
enable unique forms of human interaction.
The grid will take videoconferencing to the next level. Business travels
and
face-to-face meetings may become obsolete.
The playwright William Shakespeare wrote the famous line:
"All the world is a stage and all the men and women merely players."
The grid will redefine the word "stage." Today, Femi Kuti and Janet Jackson
can only sing a live duet by appearing on the same physical stage.
With the grid, we can imagine Femi Kuti, in Lagos, and Janet Jackson, in
Los
Angeles, both singing a live duet on a digital stage.
Indeed, the world will become their digital stage.
The grid is a hybrid between the supercomputer and the Internet.
Supercomputing is next-generation computing. Internet2 is next-generation
Internet.
Truthfully, I am not interested in next-generation technology.
I am interested in technologies that are at least ten generations beyond
the
supercomputer, beyond the Internet and beyond the grid?
In other words, where will the supercomputer and the Internet be in 100
years,
200 years, or 300 years from today?
In 300 years, I believe that the Internet will remain a spherical network
as
large as the whole world. However, because it could be a zillion times more
powerful, faster, and more intelligent, I believe that in 300 years the
Internet will evolve into a SuperBrain as large as the whole world.
Many scientists believe that bionic brain implants will be feasible in a
few
decades.
Without realizing what we are doing, we are determined to redesign
ourselves.
Our compelling urge to redesign ourselves is deep-seated and will remain so.
We have embarked on a self-propelled evolution in which we are both the
creator and the created.
Already, we have imbedded our consciousness and intelligence into
computers.
Now that we have implanted our intelligence into computers, we are now
figuring out how to imbed our computers into our brain. That is, how to imbed
inanimate intelligence into animate ones.
But as I explained earlier, computers could become obsolete and disappear
into
the Internet. Hence the computers that we intend to imbed into our brains
could eventually disappear into the Internet.
That implies that our minds and thoughts could also disappear into the
Internet.
This means that the Internet could be used to unify the thoughts of all
humanity.
Unification implies that we will become one people. With one voice. One
will.
One soul. And one culture.
Email will become obsolete. It will be replaced by tmail, which stands for
"telepathic mail."
The theory of evolution taught us that we evolved from lower order
primates.
But SuperBrain will help us understand that the human specie collectively
existed as one super being.
We will understand that we are not human beings that exist separately from
other beings. Instead, we may come to believe that we are small and separate
beings that exist within a super being.
Ladies and Gentlemen, we are indeed embarking on a lengthy journey in self-
discovery. It is a journey that will help us understand who and what we
are.
The big idea is not that we existed and evolved collectively as one super
being.
If we incorporate ideas from the theory of evolution, we may infer that
SuperBeing has been undergoing self-directed evolution since life first
appeared on planet Earth. It is a self-directed evolution along the direction
of greater complexity. A self-directed evolution that resulted in higher
collective intelligence.
Super Being is a coherent and self-organizing network of all living
biological
entities which possessed a unique intelligence that is above and beyond the
sum of the sum of intelligences of the separate living entities.
Put differently, the properties of coherence, self-organization and
interaction is what enabled the species to synergically form a super being
with an intellect that is above and beyond the sum of the intellect of all the
animals and plants on Earth.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am claiming that the animals and plants are not
distinct beings. I am claiming that the species co-exist, interact and learn
from each other.
Gaia hypothesis argues that the Earth is a living planet. From the moon, we
see a zillion species that are not isolated Entities that swim within the
Earth’s inert atmosphere, oceans or sub-surface soil.
I am adding another dimension to Gaia hypothesis. My dimension is that all
living things are inextricably connected and work together as a team to ensure
its survival as a unified being. I am not merely directly connected to my
father, brother and son. I am indirectly connected to every person, animal and
plant. We are all one being: A super being.
I began by studying the interconnectedness between millions of computers
configured around the Earth. I learned that interconnected computers do
emulate one supercomputer. I then inferred that we can use that knowledge as a
metaphor living entities which we also know are interconnected.
Therefore, I have inferred that interconnected animals and plants do
emulate
one super being.
Along the way, I learned a lesson that was deeper and one that transcended
computing. It was an epiphany.
It changed the way I looked at myself, humanity and the supreme being or
what
we call god.
I said a super being. Not a supreme being. I am not talking of the god that
transcends space, time and all things physical.
I am not talking about the theological god described in the Bible or the
Koran.
In fact, I did not talk about the existence of an ultra supreme being who
is
omniscient and omnipotent. Super being exists in a biological sense while the
supreme being exists in the theological realm. Therefore, the acceptance of my
theory will be based on reason, not faith.
As information technology thought leaders, we time traveled tonight to the
future and then attempted to predict it.
Some of my predictions will be wrong. However, one prediction that I
guarantee
you will be right is that if you can travel 10,000 years into the future, you
will certainly discover a strange world.
A world that I believe will be influenced by our on-going research efforts
to
implant bionic brains into our human brain.
If we can replace one percent of the human brain in 100 years, then we
might
be able to replace the entire brain in 10,000 years.
If we can replace the entire brain, we can download it into the SuperBrain.
And if we can download it into the SuperBrain, our descendants will merely
exist as, pure thoughts, electronic cockroaches or human algorithms.
Our descendants will have achieved digital immortality in 10,000 years.
Thank you very much.
About The Author
Philip Emeagwali is a mathematician and computer scientist. Born in 1954,
in Nigeria, Africa. President Bill Clinton called him "one of the great minds
of the Information Age" and CNN called him "A Father of the Internet."
Invented an international network that was similar to, but predated that, of
the Internet. Discovered mathematical equations that enable the petroleum
industry to recover more oil. Won the 1989 Gordon Bell Prize, computation's
Nobel prize, for inventing a formula that lets computers perform the faster
computations. During his career, Emeagwali has received more than 100 prizes,
awards and honors. These include the Computer Scientist of the Year Award of
the National Technical Association (1993), Distinguished Scientist Award of
the World Bank (1998), Gallery of Prominent Refugees of the United Nations
(2001); he was profiled in the book Making It in America as one of "400 models
of eminent Americans."
|